Rarely has such
a silly film
been so clever.
For the
uninitiated,
Borat is a
‘mockumentary’
charting the
journey across
America of the
Kazakhstani TV
reporter Borat
Sagdiyev (played
by the British
comedian Sacha
Baron Cohen) in
pursuit of
‘cultural
learnings’ –
and, latterly,
Pamela Anderson.
He is
misogynistic,
homophobic and
obsessively
anti-Semitic. To
the
understandable
fury of its
government, the
film portrays
Kazakhstan as a
nation of
filthy,
barbarous and
poverty-stricken
peasants.
Altogether,
Borat is 90
minutes of
toe-curling
embarrassment.
It’s funny and
it’s silly. But
it’s also
clever, and asks
some
uncomfortable
questions.
First, there is
the question of
civilisation.
Borat is an
obviously
primitive
caricature – yet
the film’s most
shocking lines
come not from
him but from the
Americans from
whom he is
supposedly
learning. There
are the students
whose attitude
to women makes
Borat look like
Germaine Greer;
an ageing cowboy
who talks
enthusiastically
about hanging
homosexuals; a
pastor who walks
out of a dinner
party when a
prostitute walks
in. Who is
civilised here?
Who is in a
position to
offer ‘cultural
learnings’?
Then there is
the question of
limits. Some of
Baron Cohen’s
victims are
nasty and
offensive, but
does that
justify the way
he exposes them
and holds them
up to ridicule?
Likewise,
Kazakhstan is a
real place with
real people. Is
it right to
deride it in
this way, even
if only in jest?
How far is too
far?
Third, there is
the question of
tolerance. Like
Baron Cohen’s
other
characters, Ali
G, the ‘king of
bling bling’,
and the gay
Austrian fashion
guru Bruno,
Borat is
deliberately
‘foreign’.
Superficially
nice, each is
really ignorant
and unpleasant.
Yet because they
are different,
people tolerate
them. Borat, for
example, walks
into a gun shop
and asks which
is the best
weapon to kill a
Jew. ‘A 9mm or a
.45,’ the
salesman replies
without
hesitation. How
far should we
make excuses for
other people’s
cultural
presuppositions?
Where is the
limit to
tolerance?
Last, there is
the question of
judgement. It’s
easy to laugh at
Borat’s dupes,
but I wonder how
I would fare if
an invisible
audience was
scrutinising
everything I did
and said.
Perhaps the Last
Judgement will
be one, long
Borat-style
film, in which
all our own
faults – our
casual abuses,
quietly nurtured
hatreds and
thoughtless
prejudices – are
exposed.
Let’s hope that
the viewers are
sympathetic.
Nick Spencer